How It Works Providers Compare Guides About Contact Match Tool
Modern alternatives to traditional insurance

Healthsharing & Crowdsharing: a simpler way to manage healthcare costs

Healthsharing and crowdsharing are membership based healthcare models designed to help people afford medical care without relying on a traditional insurance policy. They often cost less because they are built around transparency, cash pricing, and a simpler structure.

See if it fits you Compare options Browse providers
Healthsharing
A membership community where people contribute monthly and share eligible medical expenses based on published guidelines. Many are rooted in community values, and the core idea is simple: members help members.
Crowdsharing
A more modern version of sharing - built around transparent pricing, cash-pay negotiation, and support that helps members lower the actual cost of care. Many crowdsharing models feel more like a guided experience than a paperwork process.
How they differ from insurance
These programs are membership models, not regulated insurance policies. They use guidelines instead of insurance contracts, which helps keep costs lower — and also means you should review the rules carefully before joining.
1
You choose your membership level
Most programs have a monthly contribution plus an amount you handle before sharing begins (similar to a deductible).
2
You access care in a flexible way
Many models allow broad provider choice because they do not rely on strict networks. Some offer pricing partners or negotiated cash discounts.
3
Eligible bills are shared or reimbursed
If a medical event qualifies under the guidelines, the program helps cover it. Crowdsharing models often provide extra help navigating pricing and reducing the total bill.
4
Guidelines keep costs low
Programs typically have eligibility rules, documentation requirements, and lifestyle expectations. These policies reduce misuse and help keep membership costs lower over time.

Sharing models can lower costs by reducing overhead and pricing pressure.

Traditional insurance includes complex billing systems, mandated benefits, and heavy administrative overhead. Healthsharing and crowdsharing models often reduce costs by simplifying structure, encouraging cash pricing, and helping members navigate care more efficiently.

Lower monthly contributions
Many people join because monthly contributions can be meaningfully lower than traditional premiums.
Better cash pricing
Crowdsharing models often push for negotiated cash rates, which can reduce the actual price of care.
Less complexity, less overhead
Simpler administration can lower costs. Many models are designed to feel easier than insurance paperwork.
Member alignment keeps pools healthier
Guidelines and eligibility rules can reduce misuse and stabilize the sharing pool.
Often a fit
People who want lower monthly costs, prefer flexible provider access, and are comfortable following program guidelines.
May not be ideal
People who need guaranteed coverage rules for every condition category, or who rely heavily on ACA protections.
Healthsharing
Community based
What it is
A member community sharing eligible medical costs under guidelines.
Cost style
Often lower monthly cost, with a member responsibility amount.
Provider access
Often flexible, sometimes with preferred networks for pricing.
Big benefit
Lower cost structure + community sharing design.
Crowdsharing
Cash-pay optimized
What it is
A membership model designed around transparent pricing and helping members lower real costs.
Cost style
Often predictable monthly cost, with a set amount per event or per year.
Provider access
Typically broad, often paired with support to find better cash rates.
Big benefit
Modern experience + strong focus on reducing the bill itself.
ACA plan
Regulated insurance
What it is
Government regulated health insurance with required benefits and protections.
Cost style
Often higher premiums, but subsidies may reduce costs for eligible incomes.
Provider access
Usually network based, which can limit provider choice.
Big benefit
Stronger legal protections and standardized coverage requirements.
Crowdsharing and healthsharing are often appealing if you want a lower monthly cost and a simpler approach to care. ACA insurance may be the better fit if you want maximum regulatory protections and standardized coverage rules. Choices Ahead helps you compare both without pressure.
These questions help you choose the program that matches your expectations. We recommend saving this list and confirming answers directly with the provider.
Use the fit check Compare providers
Is healthsharing or crowdsharing the same as insurance?
No. These are membership programs and they operate using guidelines rather than insurance contracts. Many people prefer them because they can be simpler and more affordable, but it is important to review the rules first.
Why do some people save money with crowdsharing?
Crowdsharing models are often designed around cash-pay negotiation and transparent pricing. That can reduce not only monthly costs but also the total price of medical events.
Can I use my doctor?
Often yes. Many programs allow broad provider choice, but it depends on how your provider bills and what documentation is required. Some models also provide support for finding better cash-pay pricing.
What happens if I have a major medical event?
Many programs are designed to support major events, but coverage limits and rules vary. Always confirm how surgeries, hospital stays, and high-cost care are handled, including maximums and timelines.
Do crowdsharing programs cover pre existing conditions?
Policies vary. Some programs allow sharing after a waiting period, some exclude pre-existing expenses, and some have partial eligibility rules. Verify directly with the provider before joining.
Can I use an ACA plan and crowdsharing together?
Sometimes. Some people combine approaches depending on their needs. It is important to understand what each option handles and confirm rules carefully.
Use our match tool and we will show options that align with your budget, care needs, and what you value most, with plain language tradeoffs.